Monthly Archive for May, 2007

Our friends across the pond: Doing it the right way (or better than we are)

I’m up late, and that wonderful “Latest Headlines” button on the web browser’s toolbar was calling my name. And so I found this article from the BBC, which says that schools in the UK now have the same right to violate students rights as here in America. Yeah, not 1984-ish at all…

Schools in England have been given the legal right to search pupils who are suspected of carrying knives.

Suspected? What’s suspected mean? If you don’t use MySpace, your suspected, right? (Actually, I’ve heard BeBo is popular in England.) Seriously, I’ve always seen an issue, in that a student that doesn’t like another can go up to someone and say, “Hey, insert student name here got insert name of dangerous weapon, ” and run. Then, well you can imagine what happens next.

Head teachers will also be given guidance on how to use airport-style metal detectors to screen young people. The guidelines state that a pupil can be refused entry to a school if he or she refuses to be screened.

Wow. Unfortunately, they’ve been doing that in America for, oh, 6 years. And what I find is amazing, is that they catch most kids with knives gossiping to their friends, and what do the metal detectors, paid for with your tax dollars, catch? Oh, cell phones and iPods, maybe? Oh, and only denied entry. Good for them. If you refuse to have your Constitutional rights taken away in America by not going through with a screening, that’s probable cause to suspect you’re hiding something and the police officer on duty will arrest you before you can whip out your pocket Constitution.

Education Secretary Alan Johnson said knife-carrying in schools was rare, but it was illegal and a message it would not be tolerated must be sent out.

Surprisingly rare in America too, but that doesn’t stop the friggen’ searches.

For example, the guidelines suggest that randomly selected groups of pupils could be searched in order to send out a strong message of deterrence

I would guess the definition of “random” would be
“Hey, you see that group of outcasts? They might want to hurt somebody. Go search them.”
Yeah. Random.

The DfES also sets out limits for schools.

There is something we should have thought about. If only we had a document. A document that states our rights. One that limits what the Government and governmental institutions like public schools can do and search us for… oh wait….

Only members of staff authorised by the head teacher can undertake a search.

They have that here too. Doesn’t help when the principal (head teacher in UK) says “everybody join in!”

Suspicion has to be reasonable and not based on stereotypical images of certain groups of pupils.

Well, good start. Now if only people would pay attention to these rules.

Two members of staff should be present for a search and both must be the same sex as the pupil.

Same sex? Um, I’m not going to even ask why.

And students can only be required to remove outer clothing, such as coats or jackets.

That’s actually a good rule. Now, if only they follow it…

Note: I’m going to skip ahead a little bit…

“Where possible it should take place outside of public view, so that we are again respecting the individuals who clearly may have a perfectly innocent explanation for being suspected of carrying a weapon.”

Good. We need to learn that.

Overall, I’m just trying to say this: We need to stop this nonsense now. I’m writing this so us Americans can learn from our mistakes, and to hopefully keep the idiocracy from spreading. We’ve let it spread to the UK, but let’s keep it from Germany. SUSE is from there. We like SUSE.

Link to article

News article analyzed is (C) 2007 BBC

There’s good TV. There’s better TV. Then you can read this blog.

DIRECTV continues to top the ACSI’s index of cable and sattelite broadcasters. So I decided to decode the DIRECTV press release for you.

EL SEGUNDO, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–May 15, 2007–For the seventh year in a row, DIRECTV, the nation’s leading satellite television service, received a higher score for customer satisfaction than all cable TV companies in the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI).

They forgot to turn it right side up.

In this year’s ACSI survey, DIRECTV posted an index score of 67, reflecting customers’ overall satisfaction with the service, compared to the cable and satellite TV category, which scored a 62 overall.

Funny, 67, eh? My DIRECTV Plus DVR records 67% of what I tell it to.

Customers surveyed by the ACSI in the first quarter of 2007 were asked about such issues as perceived quality, perceived value and their expectations prior to subscribing to the service. The ACSI also measures customer loyalty and retention.

Retention? I called Retention last week and they gave me a free 3 months of Showtime. Something about a contract…

“Once again, no other cable or satellite provider has a higher customer satisfaction rating than DIRECTV,” said John Suranyi, president, DIRECTV Sales and Service. “We take great pride in that knowledge and our employees are to be congratulated. While we improved in some areas, we still have work to do in others to bring our performance levels up to where we believe they need to be to consistently exceed the expectations of our customers. We have initiatives in place to achieve that goal and further distance ourselves from the competition.”

DIRECTV has exceeded my expectations. I expected their DVR to suck… and boy has it sucked! I see a new slogan: Exceeding your expectations… DIRECTV!

ACSI was developed by the National Quality Research Center (NQRC) at the Stephen M. Ross Business School at the University of Michigan.

Oh, I see now… it was designed so that bad American cars would rank above better imports (Go MINI!)

Last year, DIRECTV was ranked “Highest in Customer Satisfaction Among Satellite/Cable TV Subscribers” in the 13-state Eastern region of the United States, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2006 Residential Cable/Satellite TV Customer Satisfaction Study(SM).

The 12 state Southern region approved a merger of BellSouth | AT&T. I don’t trust what one section says.

Now, I want to see where Cingular/AT&T ranked in satisfaction of cellular companies.

Kevin’s Word.: Hey, hey, no, wait, come back here!

Kevin’s Word.: Hey, hey, no, wait, come back here!
Visit that link. It came back. Welcome back Vanilla Coke (now Coca-Cola Vanilla)!

Funny, I thought the United States was based on freedom…

…and I bet you did too.
Before I begin, I would like to say hello to everyone at the NSA, FBI, CIA, or anywhere where this blog is being scrutinized to make sure I don’t say anything ‘politically incorrect’ or criticize anyone. Yo.
So, as many of you know, I have always been a firm supporter of Pres. Bush. I still am. But his buddy Alberto Gonzales has decided to, um, with no outside influence (we’ll presume the RIAA and the MPAA are government agencies) bring a new bill which takes copyright infringement (what you do when you download a song off of LimeWire) to a whole new level. I will post the CNET article and explain it point by point.

“To meet the global challenges of IP crime, our criminal laws must be kept updated,” Gonzales said during a speech before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington on Monday.

His contract with the MPAA and the RIAA is up.

The Bush administration is throwing its support behind a proposal called the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007, which is likely to receive the enthusiastic support of the movie and music industries, and would represent the most dramatic rewrite of copyright law since a 2005 measure dealing with prerelease piracy.

You’re doing good with the war, don’t screw up now, George.

The IPPA would, for instance:

* Criminalize “attempting” to infringe copyright. Federal law currently punishes not-for-profit copyright infringement with between 1 and 10 years in prison, but there has to be actual infringement that takes place. The IPPA would eliminate that requirement. (The Justice Department’s summary of the legislation says: “It is a general tenet of the criminal law that those who attempt to commit a crime but do not complete it are as morally culpable as those who succeed in doing so.”)

If you even simply visit LimeWire.com, and don’t download the program or download music, you are subject to 1-10 years in prison.

* Create a new crime of life imprisonment for using pirated software. Anyone using counterfeit products who “recklessly causes or attempts to cause death” can be imprisoned for life. During a conference call, Justice Department officials gave the example of a hospital using pirated software instead of paying for it.

What do they consider “pirated software”? The difference between pirated and legal software, except in Windows, which a hospital shouldn’t be using anyway, is none. Who cares about murderers? Get IT managers!

Permit more wiretaps for piracy investigations. Wiretaps would be authorized for investigations of Americans who are “attempting” to infringe copyrights.

What’s that little piece of paper that says you can’t do that? Oh yeah, the Constitution. Oh, ya’ll don’t know what that is.

Allow computers to be seized more readily. Specifically, property such as a PC “intended to be used in any manner” to commit a copyright crime would be subject to forfeiture, including civil asset forfeiture. Civil asset forfeiture has become popular among police agencies in drug cases as a way to gain additional revenue, and it is

Great. I don’t even have to commit a crime and they’ll take my PC. Gotta love freedom.

Increase penalties for violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s anticircumvention regulations. Criminal violations are currently punished by jail times of up to 10 years and fines of up to $1 million. The IPPA would add forfeiture penalties.

So, I can’t play DVDs on Linux anymore. Thanks, Microsoft and Apple (and Linspire).

Add penalties for “intended” copyright crimes. Certain copyright crimes currently require someone to commit the “distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period of at least 10 copies” valued at more than $2,500. The IPPA would insert a new prohibition: actions that were “intended to consist of” distribution. *

Innocent until proven guilty. This is guilty even if he didn’t do it yet.

Require Homeland Security to alert the Recording Industry Association of America. That would happen when CDs with “unauthorized fixations of the sounds, or sounds and images, of a live musical performance” are attempted to be imported. Neither the Motion Picture Association of America nor the Business Software Alliance (nor any other copyright holder, such as photographers, playwrights or news organizations, for that matter) would qualify for this kind of special treatment.

HOMELAND SECURITY? Really? Why, because all the terrorists are in Gitmo already? Your tax dollars at work.

So, what can you do? DON’T BUY ANY CD OR DVD until these leaders of this idiocracy get straightened out.